Editor, Gazette Journal:
I write in response to the Dec. 19 letters, “The myth of man-made climate change” and “Climate change a tool to redistribute wealth.” Both letters make logical arguments. Although I am a trained engineer, I am not qualified to pass judgment on either the scientific arguments in the letters or those of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). On the other hand, I am certain I cannot read the minds of the scientists involved in the debate. Therefore, I cannot know the motivations for their respective opinions. Neither can the writers of the letters be certain that the climate scientists’ motivations are to make a “comfortable living” or “redistribute the wealth.”
I think it would be prudent to err on the side of the IPCC. If the IPCC is wrong and we make unnecessary changes, we have only temporarily lost some modern conveniences. If the IPCC is right and we make the necessary ...
To view the rest of this article, you must log in. If you do not have an account with us, please subscribe here.