Press "Enter" to skip to content

Letter: False impression

Editor, Gazette-Journal:

In the Feb. 7th edition, Mathews Mirror section, the headline read "Chesapeake Bay report shows a resilient ecosystem." To some, that may be boring stuff and at a quick glance, may sound like the Chesapeake Bay program is on the right track and making real restoration progress. So it’s accepted and many often move on to other more interesting topics of the day, like sports or something. At a closer read, it doesn’t seem as resilient after all.

In fact, that very day, I happened to read in the February edition of Virginia Business (that was in the Virginian-Pilot) that told a totally different story. It said, "In its annual ‘State of the Bay’ report, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation gave the ecosystem an overall score of 32 out of 100—meaning the largest estuary in North America continues to get a failing grade. Still, the environmental group pointed out that its overall score in 2012 was one point higher than in the past report ...

To view the rest of this article, you must log in. If you do not have an account with us, please subscribe here.