News and Information for Gloucester and Mathews, VA | Thursday, April 19, 2018 Vol. LXXXI, no. 16 NEW SERIES
subscriber/user login


  • Home
  • About
    • Subscribe
    • Log in
    • Place a Notice
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • Gloucester
    • Mathews
    • Business News
    • Opinion
    • Schools
    • Sports
    • Food
    • Weekly Church Listings
    • Order Hometown Albums
    • Church News
    • Events
    • Arts
    • Pets
    • Days Past
    • Community
    • Public Record
    • Special Events
  • Obits
  • Classifieds
    • Classified Ads
    • Real Estate Ads
    • Place an Ad
  • Real Estate
  • Store
    • Subscribe
    • Find Your Ancestors
    • Order Hometown Albums
    • Placemats
  • Log in
Home » Opinion

Letter: Why object to a public comment period?

Posted on Apr 10, 2013 - 01:17 PM Printer Friendly View

Editor, Gazette-Journal:

In a rare move during its March 6 meeting, the Mathews County Wetlands Board voted to open a second public comment period on two Mathews County Land Conservancy projects at Williams Wharf. One of the projects is a proposed two-story, 19,224 square-foot "Rowing Center and Sailing Club" with a total of 7,183 square feet of impervious surface positioned over the tidal wetlands.

The "Rowing Center and Sailing Club" is huge. The name implies it’s a dedicated facility for rowing and sailing programs; it’s much more than that. This multi-use, non-water-dependent facility would be available to rent for any private non-aquatic event, and it would compete with other county facilities operated by charitable organizations such as the American Legion and the Piankatank Ruritan Club.

Can you imagine a private homeowner seeking permission to construct even a 2,000 square-foot structure over 700 square feet of tidal wetlands in which to throw parties?

After the board vote to open a second public comment period, an objection was made.

Why object to another public comment period? The opportunity for concerned citizens to provide comments—both pro and con—to wetlands board members before they decide on an application with such a profound impact on Williams Wharf, our tidal wetlands, and affected residents should cause no objection. The transparency that comes from dialogue is something a not-for-profit organization that has received millions of dollars in state and private foundation grants should welcome.

The dedication and sincerity of the wetlands board members in making decisions based on the Code of Mathews is impressive. The board is doing the right thing by allowing another chance for open and candid public discussion on the merits (or lack thereof) of the two Williams Wharf projects before it votes.

Stephen E. Wilson

Mathews, Va.

 

More:
  • Letter: Clearing up a misconception
  • Letter: School funding advocates omit details
  • Letter: Protect Mathews’ future by supporting schools
  • Letter: Highlighting a few outstanding volunteers
  • Letter: Coming after your safety net
  • Editorial: Saved … once again
  • Letter: Make Gloucester Point a beautiful entry point
  • Letter: Expand Virginia Medicaid
  • Editorial: The blood of the martyr
  • Letter: Limiting guns is only a Band-Aid
  • Letter: More budget deliberation needed
  • Letter: Budget is a process
  • Letter: Hear me out!
  • Letter: Deny Villages of Gloucester proposal
  • Letter: Rousing successes
  • Letter: Don’t mow your daffodils
  • Editorial: A matter of trust
  • Letter: ‘Brighter Childhoods’
  • Letter: ‘If you can’t take the heat …’
  • Letter: No place is free from crime

Support our advertisers

www.Hoggerealestate.com www.cbxmodulars.com

facebook

Gloucester Mathews Gazette-Journal, 6625 Main Street, P.O. Box 2060, Gloucester, VA 23061 Phone: (804) 693-3101
© Copyright 2011-2018, Tidewater Newspapers, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | Monday, April 23, 2018 - 11:14 pm