News and Information for Gloucester and Mathews, Virginia | Thursday, May 16, 2013 Vol. LXXVI, no. 20 NEW SERIES
subscriber/user login
  • Home
  • About
    • Advertise
    • Subscribe
    • Gazette-Journal Store
    • Contact Us
  • News
    • Gloucester
    • Mathews
    • Business News
  • Opinion
  • Schools
  • Sports
  • Food
  • Obituaries
  • Classifieds
    • Classified Ads
    • Real Estate Ads
    • Place an Ad
  • Real Estate
  • Store
    • Subscribe
    • Find Your Ancestors
    • Books
    • Photo Prints
Home » News

Federal funding turned down for Put-In Creek dredging

.(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) | Posted on Aug 01, 2012 - 10:32 AM Printer Friendly View
Federal funding for a dredging project proposed for Put-In Creek in Mathews has been turned down by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
 
According to the 105-page report completed by the USACE Norfolk District, signed by Norfolk District commander Col. Paul B. Olsen and dated June 2012, the project is not economically justified because it doesn’t contribute to national economic development.
 
In addition, the project would involve disturbing wetlands, and, finally, the existing conditions in the creek don’t have “a significant detrimental impact on commercial seafood and charter boat operations.”
 
The report says that the cost of the project and the ongoing maintenance required if the creek were dredged would result in a zero cost/benefit ratio and net negative annual benefits ranging from -$83,568 to -$109,480, depending on the depth of the dredge. The cost/benefit ratio was based on responses to surveys completed by commercial watermen. Twelve local watermen turned in the surveys, the report states, but only eight of the documents were sufficiently complete to be used.
 
While the recreational benefits of such a project have been touted, the report says that civil works funds may only be used to support recreational development if the commercial benefits to a navigation project equal or exceed 50 percent of the average annual cost of the project. Since the commercial benefits were zero, no recreational benefits were calculated.

To view this article in its entirety, subscribe here. Already an online subscriber? Login Here

More News:
  • Mathews to roll out red carpet for cyclists
  • Historic Thomas James Store opens to the public
  • VIMS to hold Marine Science Day Saturday
  • Tribute run has coincidental stop in Gloucester
  • Gloucester Relay to be held this weekend

Support our advertisers

www.Hoggerealestate.com

Subscribers

  • Log in

Pages

  • News
  • Sports
  • Schools
  • Food
  • Churches
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Events
  • Classifieds
  • Real Estate
  • Obituaries
  • Gazette-Journal Store
  • Photo Prints
  • Weather
Latest Gloucester, Virginia, weather

Links

  • Subscriptions
  • PDF Subscriptions
  • Place an Ad
  • RSS News Feed
  • VA News
  • Printing Services
  • Find Your Ancestors
  • Advertise With Us
  • About Us
  • Newspapers in Education
  • Having trouble with this site?
  • How to Place a Notice
  • Contact Us
  • facebook
    twitter rss

    Special Sections

    weather

    Quick Links

    • Advertise With Us
    • Place a Classified Ad
    • Find Your Ancestors
    • Place a Notice
    • Printing Services
    • Purchase Photo Prints

    Recent Posts

    • Sen. Kaine’s representative to visit Middle Peninsula
    • Mathews to roll out red carpet for cyclists
    • Historic Thomas James Store opens to the public
    • VIMS to hold Marine Science Day Saturday
    • Tribute run has coincidental stop in Gloucester
    • Gloucester Relay to be held this weekend

    Subscribers

    • Log in
    • Download Past Issues (PDF Archive)
    • May, 2013 Archive
    • April, 2013 Archive
    • March, 2013 Archive
    • Subscribe Today!
    Gloucester Mathews Gazette-Journal, 6625 Main Street, P.O. Box 2060, Gloucester, VA 23061 Phone: (804) 693-3101
    © Copyright 2011-2013, Tidewater Newspapers, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | Tuesday, May 21, 2013 - 1:21 am